The Quality Rating Framework
Page Quality (PQ) Rating Scale
Google's raters evaluate content on a five-point scale:
Highest Quality
- Exceptional E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness)
- Achieves its purpose perfectly
- Authoritative, comprehensive, and trustworthy
- Example: Mayo Clinic health pages written by medical doctors with cited research
High Quality
- Strong E-E-A-T across most dimensions
- Very helpful for its intended purpose
- Authoritative sources and accurate information
- Example: In-depth software reviews by verified industry experts
Medium Quality
- Adequate E-E-A-T for the purpose
- Somewhat helpful but may lack depth
- Mix of quality and average content
- Example: General how-to guides covering basics thoroughly
Low Quality
- Lacks sufficient E-E-A-T
- Potentially misleading or unhelpful
- May have factual issues or poor sourcing
- Example: Generic AI-generated content without human oversight
Lowest Quality
- No meaningful E-E-A-T
- Spammy, deceptive, or harmful
- Created primarily for search manipulation
- Example: Content mills with auto-generated articles
Needs Met Rating Scale
Raters also assess how well content satisfies user intent:
Fully Meets: Completely satisfies user intent with comprehensive, accurate information Highly Meets: Very helpful for most users with minor gaps Moderately Meets: Helpful for some users but lacks depth Slightly Meets: Minimal helpfulness, may require additional sources Fails to Meet: Not helpful or misleading
For GEO: Content that "Fully Meets" user intent is 3x more likely to be featured in AI responses.