Formats
Oxford, BP, town-hall, pro/con
Choose standard competitive and classroom-friendly structures
AI tools • Debate generator
Pick a format, set skill level and tone, and get motion text, pro/con opening statements, timed rebuttals, moderator cues, judge rubrics, and worksheets — with safety-first framing and citation hints for research.
Formats
Oxford, BP, town-hall, pro/con
Choose standard competitive and classroom-friendly structures
Outputs
Statements, rebuttals, scripts, rubrics, worksheets
Text blocks tuned for direct classroom or show use
Skill levels
Beginner → Expert
Tone and depth controls for different student or audience needs
Time saved
Creating balanced motions, sourcing evidence, and producing moderator materials can take hours. The generator maps debate formats to tested prompt patterns and role personas so you get complete, classroom-ready content in minutes.
Structured outputs
Select a template and persona set to produce consistent, balanced outputs. Templates encode timing, rounds, and expected deliverables so teachers and coaches can drop content straight into a lesson plan or practice session.
Motion, 3 rounds per side, 5-minute opening statements, clear definitions and motion background.
Neutral prompts, timing ticks, and tie-breaker rules to keep debates on schedule and fair.
Scoring criteria with descriptors for argument quality, evidence use, rebuttal effectiveness, and presentation.
Reproducible prompts
Each template maps to reusable prompt patterns so you can recreate the same structure across topics and models. Below are ready-to-copy prompt clusters for common tasks.
Research-friendly
Outputs include inline citation hints (source type and search keywords) to guide student research and fact-checking. For high-risk topics, the generator adds moderator warnings and suggested verification steps.
Ready-to-run materials
Download or copy export-ready text blocks tailored to your use: lesson plans, student worksheets, podcast highlight scripts, or internal pros/cons briefs for product teams.
Model & data transparency
The generator is designed to work with a range of model backends and retrieval sources. Prompts and template libraries are compatible with common LLMs and evidence retrieval systems so you can tailor outputs to institutional policies.
Who benefits
From classroom teachers to podcast producers, the generator provides quick, balanced materials that reduce prep time and improve practice quality.
A free access tier is available so you can try the generator and create debate packs for classroom or personal use. For heavier usage, advanced model selection, or extended export features, paid plans are available — see /pricing for details.
Use role-based persona prompts (Affirmative, Negative, Moderator, Judge) and the generator's safety-first framing. Enable the 'instructor review' option to require human verification, and use the evidence citation hints to cross-check sources before publishing.
Yes. Outputs are provided as export-ready text blocks (lesson plans, scripts, worksheets) intended for educational and creative use. Review and verify evidence or sensitive claims before public broadcast or formal assessment.
The generator provides citation hints: recommended source types and search keywords rather than raw URLs, to guide student research and classroom verification. For topics requiring rigorous sourcing, use the instructor review step and consult primary sources directly.
Supported templates include Oxford, British Parliamentary, town-hall, pro/con, and timed rebuttal formats. Timing, number of rounds, and statement lengths are configurable per template.
Use the tone and skill-level presets: Beginner (plain language, 3 key points), Intermediate (structured claims with evidence), and Expert (detailed policy analysis). You can also request simplified speaker notes or expanded evidence briefs.
Review citation hints, run quick fact-checks on any medical/legal/scientific claims, flag sensitive topics for pre-approval, and prepare neutral clarifying questions to keep the debate focused on verifiable claims.
Yes — export-ready formats include lesson plans, student worksheets, moderator cue sheets, judge rubrics, transcripts, and short podcast or video segment scripts.
Enable moderator warnings, require instructor review, and add suggested fact-check steps. Avoid running live debates on high-stakes medical, legal, or personal topics without expert oversight.
Yes. Choose the 'Judge rubric' template to produce competition-style or novice-friendly scoring guides with descriptors, weighting suggestions, and sample feedback comments.