simple, repeatable review cycles
How the feedback generator works
Paste any draft, snippet, or microcopy and select a reviewer lens (clarity, tone, technical correctness, UX). The tool analyzes content, groups findings into priority tiers, and returns both short notes and copy-ready rewrite blocks you can paste back into your source. Each result includes suggested follow-up prompts so teams can request rewrites, condensing, or expansions without restarting the review.
- Choose a lens to focus the review: clarity, tone, technical, UX, or hiring
- Receive feedback grouped into High / Medium / Low priority edits
- Get ready-to-paste rewrites, PR-style comment notes, and follow-up prompts
built for cross-functional teams
Who should use it
Designed for content marketers, product managers, engineers, UX designers, students, and hiring teams who need fast, consistent feedback across formats—without scheduling reviewers.
- Content teams: tighten headlines, improve CTAs, shorten product blurbs
- Developers: get clarity checks, variable-name suggestions, and edge-case prompts for code snippets
- Designers: refine microcopy, onboarding tooltips, and error messages
- Recruiters & applicants: sharpen resumes, cover letters, and interview notes
practical prompts you can paste now
Prompt clusters and copyable examples
Use these starter prompts to get targeted feedback by persona and format. Each prompt clarifies scope, expected output type, and the review lens.
Marketing copy optimization
Focus: conversion and clarity
- Prompt: "Identify the primary CTA and rewrite the headline to improve conversions; suggest three alternative CTAs (low, medium, high urgency). Return a 40–60 word product description version."
- Prompt: "Shorten this product description to 50 words while preserving the main benefit and target persona. Provide a one-sentence rationale for the edit."
Code review & clarity
Focus: readability and maintainability
- Prompt: "List the top 5 readability or maintainability issues in this function and provide a concise rewrite or refactor suggestion for each."
- Prompt: "Check this code snippet for ambiguous variable names and propose clearer alternatives with a one-line rationale per name."
UX & microcopy
Focus: reduce friction and errors
- Prompt: "Review this button label and provide three alternatives optimized for clarity and action; indicate which is best for new users."
- Prompt: "Evaluate this onboarding tooltip for necessary context and rewrite it to fit a 90-character limit."
paste, analyze, export
Supported content and source ecosystems
The generator accepts plain text, Markdown, pasted document text (Word/Google Docs), small code snippets and diffs (language-agnostic), design microcopy extracted from artboards, PRD sections, slide speaker notes, and email drafts. Output is formatted so suggested rewrites can be copied directly into code comments, PR descriptions, or slide decks.
- Plain text and Markdown files
- Document copy pasted from Word or Google Docs
- Code snippets and small diffs (all languages)
- Design microcopy and product requirement excerpts
from critique to copy in one flow
Export-ready suggestions & iteration
Every feedback pass includes copy-ready rewrite blocks and comment-style notes that fit into PRs, docs, or speaker notes. Use the included follow-up prompts (rewrite, condense, expand, simplify, change tone) to iterate without re-submitting the original content.
- Copyable rewrite blocks for immediate paste-back
- Follow-up prompts included to deepen or simplify edits
- Comment-style notes formatted for PRs and documentation
real prompts, real outputs
Quick examples — paste & try
Try these mini-scenarios to see how the generator changes output structure and tone.
Headline & CTA revamp
Input a landing page headline and product blurb. Output: three headline options, prioritized CTA variants, and a 50-word product blurb.
Small function review
Input a 20-line function. Output: top issues, suggested variable renames, and a one-paragraph refactor suggestion.
Onboarding tooltip edit
Input tooltip text. Output: three 90-character variants, one recommended replacement, and reviewer reasoning.
safe use and practical tips
Privacy, limits, and best practices
Avoid pasting highly sensitive personal data. Pasted content is processed to deliver feedback; check our About page for full privacy terms. For the clearest results, provide a short context sentence (audience and goal), specify the desired lens, and paste a contiguous section rather than an entire large document.
- Provide context: audience, goal, and tone expectation
- Specify reviewer lens and desired output format (notes, rewrite, tests)
- If working on code, include expected inputs or edge-case constraints