Export formats
CSV, spreadsheet-ready
Columns for stem, options, correct answer, explanation, difficulty, and tags
AI Tools
Quickly create high-quality MCQs tailored to grade level, domain, and assessment goals. Control number of options, difficulty mix, distractor quality, and export directly to CSV or spreadsheet-ready formats.
Export formats
CSV, spreadsheet-ready
Columns for stem, options, correct answer, explanation, difficulty, and tags
Output controls
Difficulty distribution & distractor quality
Set easy/medium/hard mix and request plausible distractors or misconception-based distractors
Bulk generation
Template-driven question banks
Produce consistent banks from syllabus bullets or learning objectives
Why use this tool
Save time creating MCQs while keeping items aligned to learning objectives and assessment standards. Use domain-aware prompts to produce clear stems, plausible distractors, concise explanations, and metadata for filtering and assembly.
Guided prompts for common use cases
Start with these copy-ready prompts. Replace the bracketed items with your specifics and paste into the generator to get consistent, review-ready items.
Template for classroom use with mixed difficulties and reading-level control.
Precise stems and distractors that target common misconceptions.
Scenario-based workplace questions tied to policy topics.
Sentence-level context and translation-ready options for targeted grammar practice.
Map items to objectives so you can assemble targeted assessments.
Tag items with difficulty and timing for timed exam prep.
Distractors, bias checks, and regional phrasing
The generator includes controls to request plausible distractors, avoid repeated keywords, and ask for distractor rationales so you can audit quality. Specify locale, terminology preferences, and units to localize items for different regions.
From generator to classroom or LMS
Export outputs in CSV or spreadsheet-ready formats with consistent columns so you can import into most LMS question banks or prepare printable tests. Include metadata columns for difficulty, tags, Bloom’s level, and mapping to learning objectives.
Scale question bank creation
Convert syllabi, lecture slides, or curriculum standards into structured inputs and use templating to produce consistent banks. This reduces manual editing and makes review cycles faster.
Where you should pull content from
Use authoritative sources—syllabi, textbooks, slide decks, and accreditation guidelines—as prompt inputs. Pair generated items with instructor review and simple psychometric checks (item difficulty, discrimination) for higher-stakes deployments.
Specify a difficulty distribution in your prompt (percentages or counts) and request difficulty tags for each item. After generation, filter or sample items by difficulty to assemble balanced assessments.
Yes. Paste learning objectives or standards into the prompt and ask the generator to map each question to an objective and indicate a Bloom’s level or cognitive skill for filtering and reporting.
Export as CSV or spreadsheet-ready files with columns for stem, options, correct answer, explanation, difficulty, tags, and objective mapping so items can be adapted to most LMS import tools.
Request distractors that reflect common misconceptions and avoid repeating keywords from the correct answer. Optionally ask for a brief rationale for each distractor so reviewers can audit plausibility.
Yes. Provide the target locale and audience details (region, preferred terms, units) in the prompt and ask for localized phrasing. Always review localized content for regional correctness before release.
The generator is useful for drafting and ideation. For high-stakes assessments, pair generated items with subject-matter expert review, psychometric analysis, and secure delivery systems.
Produce multiple equivalent forms by varying stems, distractors, and answer order. Label versions and rotate them across administrations to reduce the risk of answer sharing.